• Welcome to the American Nation News Website!

    Welcome to the ANN American Nation News website! The only place for American News, Weather, Sports Bisness, and much more all at your fingure tips! Look around, and get reading on the latest in news across the United States, and even around the world!
  • Enter your e-Mail address to follow the American Nation News and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 3 other followers

  • ANN Menu

  • American Nation News is protect by CopyScape. Do not copy!

    Protected by Copyscape Originality Checker

9-9-9 plan politics and government

Herman Cain has a plan to radically reform the nation’s tax system and make things a lot simpler for taxpayers.

Problem is, it could end up adding to the deficit and shifting the tax burden away from the wealthy and onto the poor, according to some leading tax experts.

Cain, who’s recently moved up in the polls to become one of the leading Republican presidential candidates, is basing much of his campaign on what he calls the 9-9-9 plan, which would get rid of almost all current taxes and replace them with a 9% flat tax on income, a 9% flat corporate tax and a 9% national sales tax.

Cain claims his system would raise as much tax revenue as the current complex system of federal income tax, corporate taxes and payroll taxes. And he believes his plan could bring in additional revenue by boosting economic growth.

Tax experts from various nonpartisan think tanks say without seeing more details of the plan than Cain has released thus far, they can’t say for sure whether the system would match current tax collections, or add to the deficit.

“It is theoretically possible it could be revenue neutral, if you literally taxed all of consumption,” said Diane Lim Rogers, chief economist with the Concord Coalition, a think tank that focuses on reducing the federal deficit.

Millionaire tax would cover cost of Obama jobs bill

Other experts doubt Cain’s proposal would be able to raise as much revenue as the current system, even with the addition of the sales tax.

“That’s a big revenue hole you have to fill,” said Joe Minarik, director of research for the Committee for Economic Development, referring to the significantly lower rates for income, payroll and corporate taxes. “A 9% sales tax is relatively muscular. It will raise a lot of money But my guess is you’ll probably be revenue short.”

But what is far more clear, according to the experts, is that the wealthy would end up paying less than under the current system, and the poor would end paying more.

About 22% of taxpayers, primarily low-income earners, pay no taxes and even get money back from tax credits, according to Roberton Williams, senior fellow for the Tax Policy Center. Credits they get for things like having children and the earned income tax credit offset the money they own in payroll taxes. And since they’d be paying a 9% sales tax under Cain’s proposal, their dollars won’t go as far.

“For the bottom end it’s certain to be a tax rise of substantial proportion,” he said.

The effective tax rate for the top 1% of wage earners is about 18%, Williams said, so a flat rate of 9% would mean a substantial reduction for most, even with the addition of a 9% sales tax on purchases. The wealthy are far less likely than low- or middle-income wage earners to be spending all of their earnings on purchases that would be subject to the sales tax.

“Every change in the tax system shifts who pays how much. If you’re trying to be revenue neutral, there’s always going to be winners and losers,” said Williams.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: